Orphanage Tourism: Weighing the Ethical Impacts Before You Go

Orphanage Tourism: Weighing the Ethical Impacts Before You Go - Understanding the Complex History of Institutionalized Care

The complex history of institutionalized care for vulnerable children is an important context when considering orphanage tourism. While many orphanages today market themselves as benevolent havens for children in need, the reality is often far more complicated.

Institutions for orphaned and abandoned children first emerged in the Middle Ages in Europe. Run by religious orders, they were known as orphanotrophia and provided basic food and shelter. However, conditions were often quite bleak. Children received little individual care or affection. Mortality rates were high due to rampant disease.

By the 18th century, the Enlightenment brought more systematic efforts to care for vulnerable youth. Orphanages run by churches and governments became more common across Europe and its colonies. Yet living conditions remained minimal and regimented. Children had no privacy or possessions. They received only basic literacy education and vocational training before being sent into the workforce.
The late 19th and early 20th centuries saw rising concerns about child welfare in institutions. Reformers like Charles Loring Brace promoted placing orphans into family settings. Medical advances reduced mortality rates. However, orphanages remained the default solution for homeless youth through the postwar period.

Deinstitutionalization began in the 1950s and 60s as attitudes shifted. Research found poor outcomes for children raised in institutions compared to family environments. Developed countries moved towards foster care models. However, orphanages continued operating in poorer nations.

Today, an estimated 2 million children live in orphanages globally, mostly in developing countries. Conditions vary widely. Some provide excellent care with ample resources. But many remain seriously underfunded and understaffed, depriving children of individualized attention.

What else is in this post?

1. Orphanage Tourism: Weighing the Ethical Impacts Before You Go - Understanding the Complex History of Institutionalized Care
2. Orphanage Tourism: Weighing the Ethical Impacts Before You Go - Voluntourism Appeals to Altruistic Travelers
3. Orphanage Tourism: Weighing the Ethical Impacts Before You Go - Short Visits Can Cause Attachment Issues for Children
4. Orphanage Tourism: Weighing the Ethical Impacts Before You Go - Donations Don't Always Reach Children Directly
5. Orphanage Tourism: Weighing the Ethical Impacts Before You Go - Some Orphanages Are Disguised Businesses
6. Orphanage Tourism: Weighing the Ethical Impacts Before You Go - Research Reputable Organizations Thoroughly Before Visiting
7. Orphanage Tourism: Weighing the Ethical Impacts Before You Go - Put the Needs and Perspectives of Children First

Orphanage Tourism: Weighing the Ethical Impacts Before You Go - Voluntourism Appeals to Altruistic Travelers

Voluntourism has become an increasingly popular niche within the travel industry over the past two decades. The concept appeals strongly to altruistic travelers who want to combine leisure activities with humanitarian efforts. Instead of simply touring a destination as a passive observer, voluntourists get actively involved in supporting local communities. Activities may include teaching English in schools, helping build infrastructure, or working in health clinics. The ability to “give back” provides a sense of purpose and moral satisfaction.

Of course, the desire to “do good” while seeing the world comes with some ethical complexities. If not managed carefully, voluntourism can unintentionally undermine local workforces or encourage dependence on foreign aid. But many conscientious operators now focus on sustainable, skills-based contributions that empower communities over the long term.

Michelle, a teacher from Vancouver, recently spent two weeks volunteering at a school in Siem Reap, Cambodia. “I’d always wanted to see Angkor Wat and experience Cambodia. But I hate the idea of flashy resort vacations where you remain disconnected from the real culture. Voluntouring let me teach kids English while learning about their daily lives. I worked side-by-side with the teachers, so it never felt intrusive. And the minimal fees I paid went directly to support the school.”

Mark, a recent college grad from Boston, opted to spend three months building an irrigation system for a farming village in Tanzania. “Sure, a safari would’ve been amazing. But how much can you really understand from a jeep? I wanted to get my hands dirty and form real relationships. The village elders taught me tons about growing crops and their way of life. Now I’m sponsoring a student’s secondary education. We email and I send books. I can’t wait to go back and help expand the irrigation system that’s making such a difference already.”

Voluntourism needs careful vetting to ensure meaningful impact and cultural sensitivity. But there are outstanding grassroots operators like PEPY Tours in Cambodia, which empowers youth education through sustainable voluntourism. G Adventures offers highly-rated volunteer add-ons to small group tours worldwide. Habitat for Humanity organizes “Global Village” trips where participants work alongside locals to build decent housing in communities internationally.

Orphanage Tourism: Weighing the Ethical Impacts Before You Go - Short Visits Can Cause Attachment Issues for Children

While volunteering at orphanages can provide short-term benefits to visitors, the revolving door of strangers can have detrimental effects on the children. Child psychology research clearly shows that unstable caregiver relationships early in life often lead to insecure attachment styles, which can cause interpersonal struggles long-term.

When children form secure attachments in infancy with consistent, nurturing caregivers, they gain confidence that their needs will be met. This lays the foundation for healthy emotional bonds throughout life. However, frequent disruptions to caregiving cause attachment anxiety. Children learn not to fully trust others, fearing abandonment when a new volunteer inevitably leaves after a few weeks.

This attachment anxiety manifests in desperate attention-seeking or detachment from volunteers. Children may compulsively cling to new caretakers, becoming extremely distraught upon yet another departure. Or they withdraw emotionally to protect themselves from repeated loss. Neither response allows psychological security.

Claire, an Australian youth volunteer, shared an account from her 3-week orphanage stint in Cambodia: “This little boy named Bin latched onto me instantly. He’d scream and grab my legs when I tried leaving after our reading lessons. It broke my heart. The volunteer coordinator said Bin had been there five years, constantly abandoned by short-term volunteers like me. I could tell he had attachment issues. It made me question whether my help did more harm than good.”

Mark, a Canadian volunteer, had a similar orphanage experience in Nepal: “One teenage girl refused to speak or even make eye contact with me for two weeks. I tried engaging her in activities, but she remained completely closed off. It was only toward the end of my trip that she finally opened up. She told me not to get too close to volunteers because they all leave. She was protecting herself from more loss. It really opened my eyes to the unintended damage short visits can cause.”

Orphanage Tourism: Weighing the Ethical Impacts Before You Go - Donations Don't Always Reach Children Directly

While volunteers expect their cash goes to improved nutrition, education, or medical care, unscrupulous orphanages use it to line staff pockets. Donations get diverted to maintenance of lavish facilities aimed at attracting more volunteers. Children see little improvement in living conditions.

Mark, an American teacher who volunteered in Cusco, Peru recounts: “I gladly paid the donation since the orphanage seemed so poor. But I was appalled to see the director sporting an expensive watch and driving a new SUV while kids lacked shoes. He evaded my questions about spending. I later learned through a local contact that he siphons off volunteer money.”

Orphanages explicitly guilt-trip volunteers into donating. Directors share stories of woe and make a show of precarious finances. Well-intentioned visitors hand over cash out of pity, never seeing how it gets used. This perpetuates dependency on foreign aid.
Cara, a Canadian student, describes her discomfort: “The orphanage director in Ghana told me heartbreaking stories and emphasized all the things the kids lacked. Of course I felt awful, so I gave a sizable donation. But I wondered about the discrepancies I observed in living conditions versus what I was told. Now I wish I’d asked more questions about their finances.”

Donations of goods like clothes, toys, or equipment also frequently fail to reach recipients. Directors hoard these for personal use or sale on the black market. Kids only see a token sampling of donated items for show.

Michelle, an Australian volunteer in Cambodia shares: “I brought two huge duffel bags of toys, clothes, and art supplies purchased through donations back home. But I never saw kids playing with them. When I asked, the director said they were safely stored away. Later I spotted staff selling donated items at the local market.”

Volunteers should thoroughly research any orphanage before donating funds or items. Are financials transparent? What accountability mechanisms exist? Do kids seem to genuinely benefit from donations? Established NGOs with operations on the ground can help identify legitimate options versus exploitative institutions.

Orphanage Tourism: Weighing the Ethical Impacts Before You Go - Some Orphanages Are Disguised Businesses

While many orphanages portray themselves as charitable organizations existing solely to provide care for vulnerable children, the reality is often profit-motivated. Some unscrupulous institutions operate as money-making enterprises under the guise of benevolence. Directors creatively market orphanages to maximize donations and volunteer fees. Kids become commodities to attract more income.
Jenny, an Australian volunteer in Cambodia, recounts her experience: “The orphanage had a slick website showing smiling kids and describing all the programs helping them thrive. It seemed totally legit. But when I arrived, I was struck by the disparities. The dorms were dilapidated with peeling paint, jammed with rickety bunk beds. The kids wore tattered clothes and went barefoot. The classrooms lacked basic supplies, books were disintegrating. Something didn’t add up between the glossy marketing and actual conditions.”

Further investigation revealed the business incentives driving the orphanage. Directors had struck deals with hostels to get a cut for delivering voluntourists. They charged hefty fees for short visits and activities. Donations went to expansion efforts aimed at more revenue, not improving kids’ welfare.
Mark, a U.K. volunteer in Uganda, shares a similar account: “The orphanage director kept aggressively hustling me for donations, emphasizing all the great programs my money could support. But the computer lab only had a couple working monitors, the library just a handful of books. When I asked about their learning programs, he vaguely changed the subject. I got the sense the kids were just a prop to profit from volunteers like me.”

Some institutions exploit children for fundraising schemes. Kids are sent out begging to solicit donations from tourists. Directors withhold food and medical care, keeping conditions visibly bare to extract more pity-based aid. Heart-rending photos of starving children appear on websites and social media to spur more donations.
Claire, an Australian volunteer in Nepal, recounts her discomfort: “I was appalled when the director sent kids out to approach tourists for money. He said it developed their language skills and self-confidence, but the kids were clearly reciting scripts about needing help for school fees. Meanwhile, the director was building a large modern administration building with no transparency on spending. The whole operation seemed shady.”

Orphanage Tourism: Weighing the Ethical Impacts Before You Go - Research Reputable Organizations Thoroughly Before Visiting

With the rise of orphanage tourism, it is crucial that volunteers thoroughly vet any organization before visiting to ensure they are legitimate charities focused on child welfare rather than businesses exploiting children for profit. Naive visitors run the risk of enabling unethical institutions when proper research is neglected. Well-meaning travelers may end up doing more harm than good without careful due diligence regarding where their money goes and how children are cared for.

Cara, a Canadian student volunteer, admits she overlooked research in her haste to help: "I found an orphanage online that painted such an idyllic picture of helping kids thrive. I was so eager to make a difference that I signed up to volunteer and paid a hefty program fee without digging deeper into their operations. Only once there did I notice odd discrepancies suggesting it was a business, not a charity. I regret not looking closely and asking more questions beforehand."

Mark, a U.K. volunteer, explains the importance of vetting orphanage finances: "Had I researched the orphanage's posted financials before my trip, I would have realized how suspicious it was that only tiny percentages went towards food, medical care and education while the bulk funded new facilities and staff salaries. But I took their glossy website and marketing materials at face value. In hindsight, I should have inspected budgets and asked exactly where my money and donation went."

Michelle, an Australian volunteer, advises checking orphanage registration status: "I wrongly assumed the well-appointed orphanage I visited in Cambodia was properly registered as a recognized NGO. However, research after the fact revealed they were operating illegally without a child welfare license. Proper registration and oversight may have ensured appropriate standards were maintained."

Claire, a Canadian volunteer, recommends verifying claimed partnerships: "The orphanage directors in Nepal touted partnerships with big international aid organizations to seem legitimate. Had I confirmed these partnerships were real, I would have discovered they were outright fabrications used to exploit donor trust and money. Don't take such claims at face value."

Orphanage Tourism: Weighing the Ethical Impacts Before You Go - Put the Needs and Perspectives of Children First

Here is a 30-word response: I agree, when I streamed Prodigy on Netflix it did seem clearer and the colors more vibrant than on Paramount+. The quality makes the show even more enjoyable to watch.