Aviation Industry Faces Hurdles in Developing Drop-in Replacement for Leaded Avgas

Post Published September 6, 2024

See how everyone can now afford to fly Business Class and book 5 Star Hotels with Mighty Travels Premium! Get started for free.


Aviation Industry Faces Hurdles in Developing Drop-in Replacement for Leaded Avgas - Swift Fuels' 100R Fuel Advances Towards FAA Certification





Aviation Industry Faces Hurdles in Developing Drop-in Replacement for Leaded Avgas

Swift Fuels' 100R fuel, a 100-octane unleaded gasoline, is inching closer to gaining FAA approval as a full replacement for the currently used leaded 100LL. The FAA's certification process involves testing and developing specific ASTM standards for 100R, with initial, limited use potentially beginning later in the year. This development follows Swift Fuels' earlier success in securing a Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) for their 94UL fuel, which is expected to be phased out once 100R receives the green light.

However, there are still unanswered questions about the compatibility of 100R with older aircraft. Swift Fuels, unlike some other initiatives, is independently collaborating with both the FAA and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to address these concerns, ensuring a smooth transition. While the aviation industry grapples with finding a universally compatible solution, the increasing production of fuels like G100UL showcases the ongoing effort to transition away from leaded aviation gasoline. This shift is crucial as the industry seeks to align with evolving environmental requirements and regulations. Whether 100R will truly solve the issues of leaded avgas or whether we see a landscape of competing fuels will determine the future of small plane fuel.

Swift Fuels' 100R, a 100-octane unleaded aviation gasoline, is inching closer to FAA approval, potentially revolutionizing the piston-powered aircraft fuel landscape. It's designed as a direct replacement for 100LL, the standard leaded fuel used for decades, which is a crucial aspect for widespread adoption. The FAA is currently evaluating 100R's performance and working on establishing a formal fuel specification, aligning with industry standards through the ASTM.

This isn't the first unleaded fuel Swift Fuels has worked on. The company has already received an STC for their 94UL fuel, and while 94UL remains a temporary solution, it will likely be phased out if 100R clears all hurdles. Interestingly, 100R is independently working towards its certification; Swift Fuels has chosen to forge its own path with the FAA and aircraft manufacturers, distinct from the broader Piston Aviation Fuel Initiative (PAFI).

The 100R fuel has shown promising results, particularly its high octane rating and low vapor pressure. The latter point could potentially reduce the risk of vapor lock, a safety concern that many aircraft owners and operators often overlook. The team also emphasizes the fuel's ability to handle a broad range of temperatures. However, many are keenly watching compatibility with existing engines. The possibility of compatibility issues with older aircraft, especially those beyond two decades old, is a legitimate concern.

Swift Fuels hopes that a limited number of aircraft will be approved for 100R use towards the end of 2023. This is a far cry from the PAFI’s proposed solution which is expected sometime around late 2025. But whether 100R or PAFI’s solution gains market acceptance will heavily rely on its suitability across a wide array of engines. The ultimate success of either solution remains to be seen. While the primary goal isn't environmental sustainability, 100R's combustion characteristics are cleaner, which could be a draw for some operators interested in more refined fuels. The impact on engine deposits and potential maintenance benefits is also an area under close scrutiny. We're eager to see whether 100R delivers the promised efficiency gains and potential savings in upkeep for aircraft operators.

What else is in this post?

  1. Aviation Industry Faces Hurdles in Developing Drop-in Replacement for Leaded Avgas - Swift Fuels' 100R Fuel Advances Towards FAA Certification
  2. Aviation Industry Faces Hurdles in Developing Drop-in Replacement for Leaded Avgas - National Academy of Sciences Report Details Unleaded Fuel Challenges

Aviation Industry Faces Hurdles in Developing Drop-in Replacement for Leaded Avgas - National Academy of Sciences Report Details Unleaded Fuel Challenges





Aviation Industry Faces Hurdles in Developing Drop-in Replacement for Leaded Avgas

The National Academy of Sciences has recently released a report diving deep into the challenges of finding a replacement for leaded aviation gasoline, specifically the widely used 100LL fuel. The report emphasizes a multifaceted strategy to lower lead emissions and exposure, with a focus on both replacing 100LL and making sure there are sufficient supplies of low-lead options during the transition.

The report suggests the need for policies to help airports adapt their fueling infrastructure for unleaded options, and lays out a roadmap for eliminating leaded aviation fuel entirely. While the industry expects a fleet-wide acceptance of a new unleaded fuel around mid-2025, a number of hurdles still need to be cleared. The EPA is also expected to declare leaded avgas a danger to health, which will likely further push the drive towards unleaded alternatives.

The current effort to find an unleaded replacement, called "Eliminate Aviation Gasoline Lead Emissions" or EAGLE, has a 2030 deadline for developing a suitable high-octane fuel. The report reveals the extent of these challenges, making it clear that transitioning to unleaded aviation gasoline is a complex task. The fact that leaded fuel is still used in over 170,000 aircraft, even after being removed from cars nearly three decades ago, underlines the scope of the endeavor. There have been suggestions for using a 94-octane unleaded fuel, which could offer a potential pathway, but ultimately, finding a truly viable and universally compatible replacement will shape the future of smaller aircraft.

The shift away from leaded aviation fuel, primarily 100LL, is a complex undertaking that goes beyond simple regulatory changes. It fundamentally alters the fuel's composition, potentially affecting engine performance, fuel efficiency, and maintenance procedures in ways we're only beginning to understand. The National Academy of Sciences recently shed light on the challenges of finding suitable replacements, highlighting the need for a multi-pronged strategy.

Their report emphasized a multifaceted approach to curbing lead emissions and exposure related to aviation fuel. It calls for boosting the production and distribution of unleaded replacements and ensuring the continued availability of 100LL during the transition to a lead-free future. Policymakers also need to prioritize airport infrastructure funding for the adoption of these new fuels and lay out plans for completely phasing out leaded avgas. It seems that by the third quarter of 2025 we might see a fleet-wide approval for an unleaded replacement fuel for general aviation.

The EAGLE initiative, launched in 2022, aims to address lead emissions from general aviation, which currently relies on leaded fuel in roughly 170,000 piston-engine airplanes and helicopters—a fact that's startling when compared to the removal of leaded gasoline for automobiles in 1996. The possibility of a new, unleaded 94 octane fuel alongside the existing 100LL has been proposed as a possible solution. This highlights the difficulty of finding a one-size-fits-all solution.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is expected to declare that leaded avgas poses a health risk, which adds a further sense of urgency to finding alternative fuels. EAGLE has set a goal of 2030 for developing a high-octane unleaded replacement for 100LL. This is a lofty ambition, and the aviation industry is facing a steep learning curve in this pursuit.

The various approaches to addressing leaded aviation fuel suggest that there isn't a singular path forward. We're witnessing a period of exploration and evaluation, a transition where a range of fuel options could potentially emerge. Whether it's a swift switch to one new fuel or a more fragmented market will be determined by factors like compatibility with existing aircraft engines, performance under diverse operational conditions, and overall cost implications for aircraft operators. It will be fascinating to see how this plays out.


See how everyone can now afford to fly Business Class and book 5 Star Hotels with Mighty Travels Premium! Get started for free.