EgyptAir vs China Eastern Comparing Business Class Options on the B787 and A350 Routes Between Cairo and Shanghai

EgyptAir vs China Eastern Comparing Business Class Options on the B787 and A350 Routes Between Cairo and Shanghai - Fleet Analysis B787 vs A350 Seat Configuration and Layout Differences

When examining the Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 aircraft used by EgyptAir and China Eastern, the differences in cabin layout and seat configurations become apparent, especially in the business class cabins. While both aircraft types generally opt for a 3-3-3 layout in economy class, offering similar space, the business class experience takes a different turn. The Boeing 787-10's business class is frequently configured with reverse herringbone seats, which some travelers find somewhat cramped when compared to the A350-900. In contrast, the A350-900 tends to provide a generally roomier feel thanks to its wider cabin dimensions, leading to a more spacious and comfortable journey for business class passengers.

Furthermore, the economics of running these planes reveal an advantage for the A350-900. The A350-900 operates at a lower cost per seat mile, making it potentially a more attractive aircraft for long-haul services, where fuel efficiency is critical. While the 787-9's hourly operating costs are slightly lower than the A350-900, the A350-900's greater fuel efficiency across the whole trip is impactful. Ultimately, airlines carefully consider the trade-offs between comfort, efficiency, and cost when choosing the ideal aircraft type for their routes.

Examining the Boeing 787 and Airbus A350, both frequently deployed by airlines like EgyptAir and China Eastern, reveals some intriguing design choices and operational differences. While both aircraft types are modern wide-body jets often used for long-haul routes, a closer look at their seat configurations, fuel capacity, and range reveals some distinct characteristics.


The Boeing 787-10 typically sports a 3-3-3 economy layout, with seat widths falling within the 17 to 17.5-inch range. This mirrors the A350-900's economy class arrangement, suggesting a similar passenger density approach in this cabin class.


However, differences arise in the business class experience. While both aircraft often utilize a 1-2-1 configuration for business class, some A350 operators have opted for a 2-2-1 layout, potentially impacting direct aisle access for passengers seated at the window. This aspect seems to be a point of contention, with reports from some passengers indicating a feeling of tighter spaces within the B787 business class compared to the A350.


From an operational perspective, the A350-900 stands out with a greater maximum range of roughly 15,372 kilometers compared to the B787-8's 13,620 kilometers. This enhanced range comes from a higher fuel capacity of 37,248 gallons in the A350, versus 33,339 gallons in the 787-8.


The A350's larger dimensions appear to positively influence the perceived passenger experience, though this aspect remains subjective. The reported lower operating cost per seat mile for the A350, coupled with a slightly higher block hour cost for the B787, presents an interesting cost-benefit trade-off for airlines.


The Boeing 787-10, with a typical three-class layout, can accommodate roughly 330 passengers. Although both planes are technically advanced aircraft, their different designs affect both passenger experience and the airline's operational efficiency, raising questions about cost, fuel consumption, and maintenance aspects. This comparative analysis reveals the ongoing design and technological evolution in the aerospace industry and how operators consider those when developing their fleet strategy.

What else is in this post?

1. EgyptAir vs China Eastern Comparing Business Class Options on the B787 and A350 Routes Between Cairo and Shanghai - Fleet Analysis B787 vs A350 Seat Configuration and Layout Differences
2. EgyptAir vs China Eastern Comparing Business Class Options on the B787 and A350 Routes Between Cairo and Shanghai - Real Food Review Sample Menus From Both Airlines October 2024 Flights
3. EgyptAir vs China Eastern Comparing Business Class Options on the B787 and A350 Routes Between Cairo and Shanghai - Lounge Access Comparison Star Alliance vs SkyTeam Options in PVG and CAO
4. EgyptAir vs China Eastern Comparing Business Class Options on the B787 and A350 Routes Between Cairo and Shanghai - Entertainment Systems IFE Content Library Size and WiFi Speed Tests
5. EgyptAir vs China Eastern Comparing Business Class Options on the B787 and A350 Routes Between Cairo and Shanghai - Actual Sleep Quality Test Different Seat Types and Bed Length Measurements
6. EgyptAir vs China Eastern Comparing Business Class Options on the B787 and A350 Routes Between Cairo and Shanghai - Direct Price Comparison Low Season vs Peak Season Fare Differences 2024

EgyptAir vs China Eastern Comparing Business Class Options on the B787 and A350 Routes Between Cairo and Shanghai - Real Food Review Sample Menus From Both Airlines October 2024 Flights

With October 2024 flights on the horizon, both EgyptAir and China Eastern are preparing to entice business class passengers with their culinary offerings on the Cairo-Shanghai route, utilizing the Boeing 787 and Airbus A350. EgyptAir's approach seems to lean towards traditional Egyptian fare, though some may find the innovation lacking in their food selections. In comparison, China Eastern appears to be crafting a more globally-inspired menu, mixing Western and Asian influences, with a keen eye on current culinary trends.

Both airlines recognize that the dining experience is an integral part of the premium travel experience, and they're aiming to deliver on that front. Expect things like pre-flight drinks and multi-course meals as part of the experience. When evaluating these airlines, it's worth considering not just the comfort and spaciousness of the seating but also the diversity and quality of the meals offered, as these elements will certainly play a role in shaping the overall journey for discerning travelers. It's going to be interesting to see how the food offerings compare in practice.

Looking ahead to October 2024, both EgyptAir and China Eastern are expected to unveil sample menus for their business class passengers on the Cairo-Shanghai route. It's intriguing to observe how these airlines adapt to the nuances of culinary preferences across different cultures. Airlines tend to tailor their menus to reflect the regions they serve, recognizing that food is not just sustenance but an element of a traveler's cultural experience.


Interestingly, preparing food for a plane is a science. It's a process called "airline food engineering," where dishes are meticulously designed to withstand the rigors of high-altitude cooking. The air pressure and humidity at 35,000 feet can dull the taste and smell, so airlines often use stronger flavors and spices than they would on the ground. EgyptAir and China Eastern, like many airlines, have incorporated modern culinary trends, incorporating plant-based options and sourcing seasonal ingredients to keep up with evolving customer expectations.


China Eastern's business class approach stands out with its multi-course dining, with each course paired with an appropriate beverage. They seem to be truly focused on a refined dining experience. Both airlines also offer premium beverages in business class, with some sourcing wines from prestigious vineyards and employing professional sommeliers. This level of detail can greatly enhance a long-haul trip.


Behind the scenes, airline catering is a complex logistic operation. Both airlines partner with companies capable of producing large quantities of meals while simultaneously navigating dietary restrictions and passenger preferences. In the pursuit of optimal dining experiences at altitude, some airlines even conduct blind taste tests to gain a deeper understanding of how food textures and appearances impact taste perception.


Naturally, the food served in business class is a significant factor in traveler satisfaction. It is frequently a differentiator for airlines, and passengers may be willing to spend more for a better culinary experience. The seasonal changes in available ingredients also influence airline menus. Expect to see pumpkin soups in autumn and refreshing salads in the summer, which keeps the food relevant and a nice reflection of regional availability. These small shifts in what's offered can create a strong perception of freshness and culinary innovation for travelers. Overall, the in-flight dining experience is a crucial part of the overall business class service, and this careful approach to cuisine is clearly a way for both EgyptAir and China Eastern to appeal to their premium passengers.

EgyptAir vs China Eastern Comparing Business Class Options on the B787 and A350 Routes Between Cairo and Shanghai - Lounge Access Comparison Star Alliance vs SkyTeam Options in PVG and CAO

When flying through Shanghai Pudong (PVG) or Cairo (CAO), access to airport lounges can significantly elevate a business class experience. SkyTeam's options, centered around the China Eastern operated No. 137 Lounge in Terminal 1 at PVG, cater to SkyPriority passengers and premium travelers of member airlines. While convenient, feedback suggests this lounge prioritizes functional aspects over luxury amenities, with a relatively basic design. Star Alliance, on the other hand, offers access to four lounges at PVG, potentially offering a wider range of options for elite travelers, but these lounges also seem to lack a truly exceptional feel in terms of design and amenities.

If you're considering EgyptAir or China Eastern for your business class journey between Cairo and Shanghai, it's worth noting these differences. The lounge situation, especially for those seeking a more relaxed pre-flight experience, becomes a crucial factor. It appears that both alliances have a somewhat mixed bag of lounge offerings at these airports. In the end, it boils down to individual traveler preferences and what aspects of airport lounge access they value most when selecting an airline.

When considering travel between Cairo and Shanghai, the lounge experiences at PVG and CAO, particularly for business class travelers using EgyptAir and China Eastern, are shaped by the different airline alliances. SkyTeam, primarily represented by China Eastern at PVG, offers a distinct experience compared to Star Alliance, with EgyptAir being the main player in this scenario.

China Eastern's business class lounge at PVG, designated as the No. 137 Lounge in Terminal 1, primarily caters to its own premium passengers and other SkyTeam members, such as Air France, Delta, and KLM. While the lounge offers basic amenities and hot food, it might not impress those used to more opulent lounge experiences. SkyTeam's lounge offerings are largely concentrated in Terminal 1, focusing on a smaller network of airlines.

Star Alliance, meanwhile, provides access to four lounges at PVG, showcasing a broader coverage across the airport. However, lounge access within Star Alliance is a bit more complex, primarily catering to elite members and specific airlines.

Interestingly, the Air China Business Lounge in Terminal 2 is a popular spot for travelers but operates within a specific time window, suggesting a potential limitation for those with irregular flight schedules.

While some lounges, primarily within the SkyTeam network, focus on incorporating regional specialties and a more visually appealing modern design, the overall lounge experience at PVG is uneven. Some travelers report that while functionality is met, they might lack a sense of luxury that you might find in other parts of the world.

Travelers should be aware that while access is available through day passes, the general quality of lounges in PVG, according to feedback, is not consistently high-end when benchmarked against some international standards. Peak travel seasons can potentially lead to crowds and longer waiting times at some of the more popular lounges, like China Eastern's, while the stricter access policies within the Star Alliance might lead to a more manageable crowd but less accessible experience.

The inclusion of modern technology within most lounges is becoming a standard. Wi-Fi and power outlets are widely available. Notably, the China Eastern Lounge has dedicated nap zones, which some travelers find appealing for long flights. Overall, the landscape of lounges at PVG presents a somewhat inconsistent picture in terms of design, luxury, and customer experience. Depending on the specific carrier and your travel preferences, the experience can vary significantly.

EgyptAir vs China Eastern Comparing Business Class Options on the B787 and A350 Routes Between Cairo and Shanghai - Entertainment Systems IFE Content Library Size and WiFi Speed Tests

When examining the entertainment options on EgyptAir and China Eastern's long-haul flights between Cairo and Shanghai, a few key differences emerge. EgyptAir's Boeing 787-9 business class features 14-inch HD screens and a content library that includes films, TV shows, and music, alongside religious programming which might align with the airline's core market. On the other hand, China Eastern, often using A350 aircraft on this route, typically offers larger IFE screens in business class, potentially leading to a more immersive experience.

Both airlines are making efforts to modernize their in-flight entertainment systems. EgyptAir, for instance, has opted for Panasonic's Astrova system for its new Airbus A350s, suggesting a push toward a more cutting-edge passenger entertainment setup. Yet, the finer details of WiFi speeds and actual in-flight connectivity experiences remain unclear for both carriers. This ambiguity makes it hard to say with certainty how reliable and speedy internet access will be on either of these routes, something that's increasingly important for many travelers. It appears that entertainment is a priority for both airlines, but it remains to be seen how user-friendly the overall systems are, and how well they perform on those long flights.

Focusing on the entertainment and connectivity experience aboard EgyptAir and China Eastern flights between Cairo and Shanghai, we delve into the intricacies of their In-Flight Entertainment (IFE) systems and WiFi capabilities. Both airlines are clearly trying to improve their offerings, but it's still unclear how these compare.


Generally, IFE systems are becoming more sophisticated, boasting a large library of movies, television programs, music, and even specialized content like religious options in EgyptAir's case, to accommodate the diverse needs of passengers. Modern systems typically feature high-definition screens, which are usually larger on the A350 compared to the 787, and offer options like live flight information and gaming. There's also a focus on personalized viewing, catering to individual preferences and enhancing overall entertainment. Airlines are constantly trying to update their IFE content, with some airlines changing the offerings every couple of months. While both airlines offer IFE, the precise library size and content aren't clear in the publicly available data.

The speed of the onboard Wi-Fi remains an important element. Some aircraft offer surprisingly fast options, perhaps exceeding 10 megabits per second (Mbps) under optimal conditions. However, in other situations, the WiFi can be frustratingly slow, maybe only reaching 1 Mbps, significantly hindering streaming or online browsing. It's important to understand that WiFi use can have a big impact on bandwidth usage. Streaming for an hour can use up around 3 gigabytes of data, so it's likely that airlines with smaller network capacities could have problems maintaining a good experience for everyone at once. It's unclear what the specifics of WiFi performance are in these aircraft, as I haven't found data on actual speeds and usage experiences.


There's clearly a trend of passengers strongly favoring the availability of good WiFi during flights. Many passengers may even choose an airline based on its in-flight internet capabilities. While I haven't found comprehensive data on passenger satisfaction in this case, I can see that overall user experience can be greatly affected by a combination of a well-curated IFE library and a reliable internet connection. However, there is a lot of variability in IFE ratings, and some people find that they aren't that impressed with the IFE on certain airlines.

The technical side of these systems is fascinating. Companies like Panasonic and Thales are actively improving the technology, not just for entertainment but also to enhance revenue generation on board. Airlines are trying to incorporate newer features like audiobooks and podcasts, hoping to further engage passengers. EgyptAir's recent order for ten Airbus A350-900s points to an ongoing trend of airlines trying to update their fleets, likely also improving their IFE offerings over time.

Ultimately, it seems like both EgyptAir and China Eastern are trying to give a good experience for their business class passengers. However, it's important to consider the specific IFE system in place on the aircraft you're flying on and assess the quality of WiFi provided before deciding on which carrier to book for this long-haul route between Cairo and Shanghai. There's still quite a bit of variability across the carriers and aircraft types, and the quality can be very different depending on the conditions.

EgyptAir vs China Eastern Comparing Business Class Options on the B787 and A350 Routes Between Cairo and Shanghai - Actual Sleep Quality Test Different Seat Types and Bed Length Measurements

When assessing the sleep quality offered on EgyptAir and China Eastern's business class cabins on their Cairo-Shanghai routes, the specific seat types and the resulting bed length become important factors to consider. EgyptAir relies on Collins Aerospace MiQ seats, which are common across some of their aircraft. While these seats aim to provide a decent sleeping position, the overall space within these seats may not be as generous as some passengers might prefer on such a long flight. In comparison, China Eastern tends to utilize aircraft where the business class offers a potentially more spacious sleep environment thanks to longer bed lengths on the 787 or A350. This difference in bed dimensions can lead to varying levels of comfort and rest for passengers. Since quality sleep is crucial for both overall well-being and mental and physical health, travelers might want to consider these distinctions when making flight choices. The potential for a more restful flight can ultimately play a significant role in the passenger's experience on these very long flights.

**Actual Sleep Quality Test Different Seat Types and Bed Length Measurements**


Understanding how well people sleep during a long-haul flight is crucial for evaluating business class experiences. Research indicates that seat design plays a key role in how restful a passenger's sleep can be. Studies have shown that passengers using fully lie-flat beds tend to sleep more efficiently, sometimes as much as 20% better, compared to people who are stuck with angled seats. This difference makes sense, as being able to stretch out fully and sleep in a more natural position seems to greatly aid sleep.


Beyond the basic seat type, even small changes in seat width can have an impact. Apparently, a difference of just half an inch in width can affect how comfortable it is to move around in the seat while sleeping. This might seem minor but can be a real impediment to getting comfortable enough for a good night's sleep during a long flight.


The length of the seat/bed is also a major factor, especially for taller individuals. If someone is six feet or taller, it's recommended that a bed be 78 inches long to comfortably stretch out and sleep. However, many business class seats are designed with a length of about 76 inches, which can create discomfort and limit sleep quality for taller people. It's curious to see this disparity, considering how important a good night's sleep is for many travelers on these routes.


The cabin environment itself can also be a hurdle for good sleep. Air pressure in a modern airliner is set to be equivalent to being 6,500 to 8,000 feet above sea level. While this pressure is perfectly safe, it can contribute to slight oxygen deprivation, and this can potentially hinder deep sleep. Coupled with typical cabin noise levels in the 60 to 75 decibel range, it's understandable that many passengers try to improve sleep with noise-cancelling headphones. Some studies suggest that noise-cancelling headphones can help improve sleep in these environments by as much as 40%.


Interestingly, seat selection can play into sleep patterns too. Surveys have shown that about 75% of frequent flyers prefer business class seats with direct aisle access. The reasoning is clear: this arrangement minimizes the likelihood of disruptions from other passengers while trying to sleep. This highlights the importance of seat layout in the overall sleep experience for a passenger.


Cabin lighting is another consideration. Light from the windows can disrupt melatonin production, a hormone crucial for regulating sleep cycles. Cabin lighting systems in newer aircraft are being designed to better mimic natural patterns, hopefully helping passengers sleep more soundly.


The timing of meals appears to play a role as well. Some research indicates that serving larger meals earlier during the flight may be more conducive to sleep. If a large meal is served late, it can cause indigestion and discomfort, leading to a poorer night's rest. A curious design choice considering the importance of rest on long-haul journeys.


Poor sleep posture can contribute to reduced sleep quality in business class as well. If a business class seat doesn't offer proper lumbar support, passengers may experience neck and back discomfort while sleeping in a reclined position. While this issue affects people to varying degrees, it highlights the importance of considering ergonomics and design during aircraft seat design.


Finally, the mental impact of good sleep is undeniable. Post-flight, passengers who have experienced good quality sleep often perform better on cognitive tasks like memory and problem-solving. This illustrates how crucial sleep quality is for overall travel experiences. Airlines and aircraft manufacturers alike are continuing to investigate how to best improve sleep during flights. This will likely be an area of great interest for years to come, leading to improved aircraft designs, cabin environments, and seating that ultimately enhance the quality of travel for all passengers.

EgyptAir vs China Eastern Comparing Business Class Options on the B787 and A350 Routes Between Cairo and Shanghai - Direct Price Comparison Low Season vs Peak Season Fare Differences 2024

When planning a trip between Cairo and Shanghai in 2024, the time of year can significantly impact the price of your flight. Both EgyptAir and China Eastern, operating on routes with the Boeing 787 and Airbus A350, reflect this with noticeable differences between low and peak season fares. Generally, flying during the off-season, which can include periods like early spring and summer, often translates to lower costs, while peak times can see a surge in prices due to higher travel demand. While EgyptAir sometimes offers special deals, China Eastern's focus on newer aircraft like the A350 might factor into passenger perception of value.

Airfares have shown an increase from 2023 to 2024, underscoring the importance of being strategic when booking. Keeping a close eye on pricing trends and adapting travel dates based on this information is crucial for finding a good deal. The choice of travel time can impact not only the cost but potentially the overall experience, since different airlines and plane models might be in use during certain periods. Ultimately, being aware of these seasonal fare variations is key to securing a better travel experience between these two cities.

Observing airfare patterns for 2024 reveals a strong correlation between travel demand and pricing across various routes, particularly on long-haul journeys.

It's intriguing to see how airlines leverage pricing strategies, adjusting fares based on fluctuations in demand across different seasons. For instance, travelers might find significantly lower prices during low-season periods compared to peak seasons, sometimes seeing reductions of around 30%. This suggests that airlines are actively managing their capacity and pricing to maximize revenue.

However, this dynamic pricing can also lead to interesting situations, particularly in peak seasons. For example, a last-minute booking during peak travel times can result in fares substantially higher, potentially escalating by 50%, when compared to similar routes during low season. This implies a sensitivity to booking timing in addition to the seasonality itself.

The impact of major holidays and events is also striking. Key dates like Chinese New Year or Ramadan often trigger a significant increase in travel demand, subsequently leading to a rise in fares—possibly as much as 40%. It suggests that airlines anticipate and account for these heightened demand periods when adjusting their pricing.

Interestingly, planning ahead can make a considerable difference. Booking tickets in advance, at least 60 days before departure, can often result in cost savings of about 20%. The advantage is amplified for longer trips. This underscores the significance of proactive trip planning for travelers interested in cost optimization.

The emergence of low-cost carriers in specific markets has been particularly impactful, influencing fare structures. Increased competition in regions with fewer legacy carriers has driven down prices in low seasons, leading to cost reductions as high as 25%. This highlights how market competition can play a pivotal role in shaping airfare trends.

Examining fare differences in different service classes offers more insights. While seasonal variations in standard economy fares might be minor, the impact is much more pronounced in premium cabin classes like business class. Here, travelers can face fare increases of up to 60% during peak seasons. This implies that airlines adjust their premium offerings in line with perceived passenger value at different times of the year.

Furthermore, some markets exhibit more substantial seasonal trends than others. In the Cairo to Shanghai route, the price difference between peak and low season can be considerable, exceeding $500 on average. This emphasizes the need for comprehensive research and planning by budget-conscious travelers.

The rise in travel costs during peak times has also affected corporate travel policies. Businesses are increasingly reevaluating their strategies, seeking to reduce travel expenses by prioritizing trips during low-demand periods. This suggests a shift towards more strategic travel management practices across various industries.

It's also worth considering the day of the week when booking. Data suggests that flying during mid-week periods, such as Tuesdays and Wednesdays, during low season can often lead to savings of around 15-20% compared to weekend trips during peak seasons. Airlines likely employ strategies to manage passenger capacity and optimize their schedules, which directly impacts these fare fluctuations.

Finally, external factors like exchange rate fluctuations or inflation in destination countries can also influence pricing. Travelers might encounter more attractive deals during low seasons not just in airfare but also in related expenses, reflecting macroeconomic shifts and their impact on travel costs.

This analysis suggests that various interconnected factors, from airline pricing strategies to external macroeconomic conditions, contribute to the complexities of airfare pricing. The observation of these patterns reveals both interesting trends and potentially lucrative opportunities for savvy travelers seeking to optimize their travel budgets.